New life
New country
It's about the 4Fs: Family, Friends, Food, and Faith
Happy Thanksgiving!
a venue for sharing my and your vivid memories, passionate concerns, and intriguing ideas on innovation and socio-cultural, political-economic, and environmental issues. Copyright © 2004-2010. All rights reserved.
In 2003, the world famous and at one time the largest indoor aquarium in the world, the John G. Shedd Aquarium, located in
See: http://www.sheddaquarium.org/sea/fact_sheets.cfm?id=111
Now, the west coast seeks to create their own coral reef exhibit focusing on the
There is much potential in transnational environmental activism and collaboration. Fiipinos and American-Filipinos, along with Americans, can accomplish much.
See the SF Chronicle blurb below.
Philippine sea treasures take center stage at new Cal Academy of Sciences

California Academy of Sciences Artist rendition of the new $400 million Philippine Coral Reef exhibit.
The Philippine Coral Reef off the coast of
So the California Academy of Sciences is creating a $400 million replica of the reef here in
In this Pinoy Pod podcast, The Chronicle's Michelle Louie reports on how the academy is working with scientists and researchers in the
Part 1 of a two-part podcast.
Listen:
To read a recent story by The Chronicle's Carl Hall on the new California Academy of Sciences museum, click HERE
Posted By: Benny Evangelista (Email) |
Philippine Coral Reef a source of life

California Academy of Sciences Diagram of $400 million Philippine Coral Reef project.
The California Academy of Sciences is building a $400 million model of the Philippine Coral Reef in
But on the other side of the
Pusod, a

California Academy of Sciences Artist rendition of new exhibit
In the second of a two-part podcast, Babilonia talks about what the reef means for residents on the coast of Batangas province, about the need to help save the reef from man-made ecological problems and how the San Francisco project will help.
She talks with The Chronicle's Michelle Louie from the
Listen:
For Part One, click HERE
To read a recent story by The Chronicle's Carl Hall on the new California Academy of Sciences museum, click HERE
PINOY POD COMMUNITY CALENDAR: Read More »
Posted By: Benny Evangelista (Email) |
Listed Under: Asian American, Environment, Pinoy Pod | Permalink | Comments (0) : Post Comment
Listed Under: Asian American, Environment, Pinoy Pod, Science | Permalink | Comments (0) : Post Comment
Looking out of our dining room window, we can see the
Check out these awesome videos.
Wow
Byahe tayo, the music video. Twenty-one Filipino artists singing about the beauty of the Philippines. Great scenery shots. Video can be downloaded for free from the Philippine Department of Tourism website at http://www.wowphilippines.com.ph/index.asp.
Diving the
Greenpeace video on Apo Island

The 19 October 2007 explosion at the Glorietta II mall owned by listed-company Ayala Land Inc. and located at the Makati Central Business District (CBD), which killed close to a dozen people and injured over 100 others, is begging for more questions. The tacky joke circulating these days is that it wasn't C4 that caused the explosion but C.R.! (CR is an acronym for comfort room, the Filipino term for restroom). Investigative teams from the Philippine government and the United States, Australia, and even Israel suggest that it may be a deadly brew of gases that caused the explosions. See US, Aussie, Israeli teams say Glorietta not bombed. Manila Standard columnists Tony Abaya and Jojo Robles have commented on the contradictory statements and initial findins between the investigative teams and
My view is that
By now it should be clear whether it was a real bomb or a stink bomb that caused all that destruction.
An environmental risk assessment (ERA) specialist can easily comment on this. In any case, what did their Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) filed with the DENR state about the placement of cooking fuels tanks and wastewater treatment systems? Was there an ERA study required or done? What can their architects and engineers say about their design? I wonder what sort of environmental remediation is being done? The
If indeed it was a gas explosion, the liabilities Ayala faces will be significant, not counting loss of face. It's beginning to look like Ayala is between a rock and a hard place. It will be interesting how they and support groups such as Makati Business Club will act.
Pilfered Scholarship Devastates Gen. Petraeus's Counterinsurgency Manual
It is possible to have a fully powered solar home that is close to the costings of a "standard" built home.
Teams from twenty universities proved it and showed the world how at the recent Solar Decathlon.
Held every two years, 20 selected teams of college and university students compete in designing, building, and operating, fully functional, energy-efficient, yet aesthetically pleasing homes. The competition is held at the the National Mall in
Architecture — 200 points
Engineering — 150 points
Market Viability — 150 points
Communications — 100 points
Comfort Zone — 100 points
Appliances — 100 points
Hot Water — 100 points
Lighting — 100 points
Energy Balance — 100 points
Getting Around — 100 points
This year's top three winners are:
Technische Universität Darmstadt
Marshall Sahlins addresses the call for a more updated discussion on anthropologists and Iraq/Afghanistan in his letter to NYT. See the link below, which was forwarded to the e-anth listserve.
The incident he was talking about can be found here: U.S. Guards Kill 2 Iraqi Women in New Shooting - New York Times
(an open letter to the New York Times)
To the Editor:
The report (Oct.11) of the killing of two Iraqi women by hired guns of the State Department whose mission was “to improve local government and democratic institutions” bears an interesting relation to the story of a few days earlier about the collaboration of anthropologists in just such imperious interventions in other peoples’ existence in the interest of extending American power around the world. It seems only pathetic that some anthropologists would criticize their colleagues’ participation in such adventures on grounds of their own disciplinary self-interest, complaining that now they will not be able to do fieldwork because the local people will suspect them of being spies. What about the victims of these militarily-backed intrusions, designed to prescribe how others should organize their lives at the constant risk of losing them? What is as incredible as it is reprehensible is that anthropologists should be engaged in such projects of cultural domination, that is, as willing collaborators in the forceful imposition of American values and governmental forms on people who have long known how to maintain and cherish their own ways of life.
Of course, these collaborating anthropologists have the sense that they are doing good and being good. I am reminded of a cartoon I saw years ago, I think it was in the Saturday Review of Literature, which shows two hooded executioners leaning on their long-handled axes, and one says to the other: “The way I see it, if I didn’t do this, some sonovabitch would get the job.”
Marshall Sahlins
______
My last comment is this:
Let us again remind ourselves of the consequences of the
US SPENDING IN
TROOPS IN
IRAQI TROOPS, CIVILIANS & OTHERS IN
QUALITY OF LIFE INDICATORS
RESULTS OF POLL Taken in
Other sources:
Iraq War Results & Statistics as of Sept 23, 2007,
Iraq War Casualties - FCNL Issues
Brookings Institute’s Most Recent Iraq Index PDF
Anthropologists working for the military imply engagement with the military as an institution. The operative word is engagement. In this context, one end goal of the anthropologist should be to influence policy, vision, goals, and objectives of the institution. Are anthropologists really in a position to do so?
What aspect of the statistics shown above are they working on and hoping to achieve? What part of it includes studying culture, society, and humanity without compromising the interests of your subjects?
Are they really doing applied anthropology? Or are they using applied anthropology methods and perspectives in counter-insurgency operations? Someone noted to me that in a free country, anyone including anthropologists, can express their opinion and choose their employer. That is correct, but semantically, are they applied anthropologists or just counter-insurgency specialists or even- soldiers? Let us get our semantics right.
Read When governance fails: Murder in the island - 10/05/07
This is about the October 3, 2007 murder of World Wildlife Fund community organizer and farm supervisor as well as Sibuyan, Romblon Municipal Councilor, Armin Marin during a confrontation between staff and security personnel of a mining consortium and environmentalists/mining oppositionists. Check out the YouTube tribute to him and sign on the online petition to ban mining in
http://magdiwangromblon.blogspot.com/.
Councilor Marin is the 23rd environmental activist to be killed in the
There are some revealing information on the web. Among the interesting ones are the following:
1. The mining rights have been sold to one corporation after another, mostly foreign. Nothing irregular here, except that the current mining rights or lease holder has already paid a premium and will definitely want a good ROI. Note also that some of these mining companies are publicly listed so they have to produce a profit for their shareholders, no matter what. See the following blogs written by Romblon locals:
http://bunsurancaravan.blogspot.com/
2. The ECC was for small scale mining. The permit to cut trees indicate massive tree cutting and site development. See
http://www.flickr.com/photos/14260687@N03/
The ECC should have been for large scale mining not small scale mining. They used the loopholes in the Small Scale Mining Act to apply for several but contiguous small scale mining projects. In reality this makes it large scale mining.
3. This mess wouldn't have happened if Filipinos themselves were more ethical. Money has tainted the mining technical staff, environmental consultants, mining corporations, LGU officials, etc. Some web links indicate that an ex-Mines Bureau top official was an officer of one of the mining firms. Some of the most prominent geologists and businessmen in the country were mining leaseholders. Provincial and LGU officials welcomed and endorsed the mining companies. Poverty is also forcing residents into illegal logging.
See this blog for the interview of the Romblon Congressman and the comments thereafter:
http://www.sanrokan.com/newsanrokan/frontpage/blogs.asp?bloggerid=5&artid=9
Here's a partial list of proposed mining projects in the country:
Here are some of the websites of the mining companies:
Altai Resources Inc.- Relationship of Altai & APMC, Philippines
http://www.altairesources.com/ATMD&A04.PDF.
http://www.pelicanresources.com.au/reports/quart_report_mar2006.pdf
Theoretically, there is good mining and bad mining. Good mining operations develop the local economy, assist social development, contribute to national industrialization, develop infrastructure, promote technology and skills transfer, etc. UP's Dr. Teddy Santos suggested that the
Does good mining exist in the country? Rio Tuba comes to mind. I wouldn't call them saints, but maybe the presence of 3,000 Muslim rebel returnees in one of the barangays of Bataraza, the suspicion that Bataraza is an R n R area of Muslim revolutionaries and possibly Abu Sayyaf, the presence of vulnerable foreign technical staff there, the fact that the mining law requires them to spend over P100 million on social development projects (1% of direct mining and milling costs), the strict provisions of the Palawan Strategic Environmental Plan, the presence of active environmental NGOs, and a more assertive LGU leaves them no choice but to implement environmental and social development programs.
Only time will tell if good mining is possible in the
(See http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article3028709.ece for a backgrounder on this.)
I agree with Tony Abaya's post below, but the cultural wars here in the
The other point is that Am-Fils and Filipinos are increasingly spending a lot of time online. Their presence and membership in online communities can only but increase over time. This is a phenomenon that should be noted and studied. With their talent and available online time and their how they are connecting with one another, their online presence will be something to contend with in the future. The Malu Fernandez saga, the online petition and the e-bombardment of ABC.com are clear examples.
Third, we need to encourage more Filipinos and Am-Fils to be more aggressive in defending their rights as an ETHNIC COMMUNITY. Meekness in this day and age, especially when other groups, are pushing their agendas to our detriment, can be disastrous. This is a good exercise in demanding governance, which can and should be replicated in the
Lastly, if we consider Filipino doctors/ medicine as a brand, the DH slur has economic and professional implications. As Rodel Rodis noted, the
Yes, we have the Recto diploma mills, the nursing scandal, and the occasional grumpy/lazy medical person, but that is nothing compared to the tens of thousands of competent, dedicated, and nurturing Filipino doctors, nurses, and medical technical staff all over the world.
Hecky
Antonio Abaya
Our Image
By Antonio C. Abaya
Written on Oct. 15, 2007
For the Standard Today,
October 16 issue
A country’s image abroad is created by a combination of fortuitous events and how its people react to those events, and deliberate efforts to enhance or destroy an image that has been created.
In the past 20 years or so, the most positive image that the
It was a watershed event in modern world history and contributed immensely to the triumphs of other unarmed peoples around the world in their confrontations with their tormentors, principally the largely peaceful collapse of communist regimes in Eastern Europe in 1989, the dismantling of apartheid in South Africa in 1991, and the implosion later that year of the ‘evil empire’ that was the Soviet Union.
In 1986, Filipinos basked in the adulation of the rest of the world. We were proud to be Filipinos and we held our heads up high as we have never done before, or since. Those of us who were privy to the information were confident that our beloved Cory Aquino was on her way to being formally recognized by the world community with the most sought-after honor on the planet, for which she had been nominated..
But a funny thing happened on the way to the Nobel Peace Prize in 1988. Mrs. Aquino freed from detention the communist leader Jose Ma. Sison in 1987, over the objections of the military who had spent countless lives and treasure in hunting him down.
Mrs. Aquino no doubt followed her Pollyanna-ish gut instinct that if she were nice to Joma and his communists, they would in turn be nice to her and wind down their Maoist revolution.
Nothing like that, of course, happened. Joma showed his gratitude by going into exile in Europe and, from his base in
It was a formidable demolition job and not all the novenas and supplications on bended knees of her Prayer Brigade saved the day for Cory, and she lost out to some relative unknown in
The point of all this is to demonstrate that we Filipinos are our own worst enemies. We have a bad image because our political leaders, from Marcos to the present, have given us so few pluses to be proud of, and so many minuses to be ashamed of.
After the highs of People Power in 1986, it was downhill all the way. Consider the images that we have projected since then: Imelda’s 3,000 pairs of shoes; 30-push-ups punishment for coup leaders in December 1986; Gringo’s coup attempts against Cory in 1987 and 1989; Smokey Mountain as an iconic image of the country; ten-hour daily power outages in 1991-1992; massive electoral cheating in 1992, 1995, 2004 and 2007; a criminally inclined ignoramus as president; the only country with two (Marcos and Erap) “most corrupt leaders’ in the Guinness Book of World Records; cheating over age-limits in the Little League softball championship in the US; the ‘Hello Garci’ tapes in 2005; Joc Joc Bolante in 2006; cheating in the nurses’ exams in 2006; “most corrupt country in Asia” in 2007; the ZTE scandal in 2007; etc.. Is there no end to our humiliation?
It is in this context that I bring up the battering that our image has suffered in American pop culture in recent days.
While I agree with the 85,000 Fil-Ams and Filipinos who signed an internet protest demanding an apology from ABC for the slur against Philippine med schools that one of the characters in ‘Desperate Housewives’ uttered in one episode, I am surprised at the vehemence of the protest.
Only three or four years ago, two American radio jockeys - one of them Howard Stearn, I do not recall the other’s name – broadcast some really vicious and nasty remarks against Filipinos: Filipinos are good-for-nothings, unlike the Japanese, the Koreans and the Chinese, whom Filipinos try to pass themselves off as their ‘fellow Asians.’. Or many, many more words to that effect. Compared to which, a snide one-liner about our med school seems petty. Yet there was no massive internet outcry against it. Was it because it was ‘only’ on radio, not on primetime TV?
Not having watched a single episode of ‘Desperate Housewives,’ I cannot vouch for the counter-argument that the show has also made digs at Chinese, Jews, Blacks and other minorities. As if two Wongs can make a White. If this is so, then mainstream US TV may be rebelling against the prissy cult of political correctness, a trend long noticeable in the routines of stand-up American comedians outside primetime TV.
I have a sneaking suspicion that that snide remark was inserted by a Filipino or a Fil-Am writer or researcher in the producer’s staff. Implicit in that remark was some familiarity with our very own
As for scrawling the word “Slut!” on Cory Aquino’s portrait, this was unforgivable, not only because it was offensive, but also because it was not funny at all. I do watch John Stewart and ‘The Daily Show.’ And I do enjoy the clowning and ribbing against George W, Uncle Dick and the other neo-cons. But sometimes, the humor is flat, forced and not worth a fiddler’s fart. This was one such case.
In the context of the episode – Is
Scrawling ‘Slut’ on Cory’s portrait is the comedic equivalent of scrawling ‘Genius!’ on George W’s portrait, to emphasize the opposite of the word as it applies to the subject. Using the word ‘Slut’ on Cory Aquino, however, reveals a poverty of comedic imagination, and the writer should be sacked for his failure to be funny at all. *****
Reactions to acabaya@zpdee.net or tonyabaya@gmail.com. Other articles in www.tapatt.org and in acabaya.blogspot.com